Showing posts with label media. Show all posts
Showing posts with label media. Show all posts

Tuesday, 12 June 2012

Ethics

Lecture Week 9 - 23/04/12


Right or Wrong?

In the media we are often faced with a moral decision we must make in regards to what stories we persue, how we persue them and how we portray them to the public. However, the increase in technological advances has meant laws struggle to keep up to protect individual rights and the question what is right, and what is wrong is increasingly hard to answer.



There are 3 main types of ethic models in regards to Journalism in use today:
  1. Deontology - the normative ethical position that judges the morality of any action by following the rules, pricipals and duties of a Journalist.
  2. Consequentialism - idea that it doesn't matter how you get there, the end justifies the means. The idea of the greatest good for the greatest number of people.
  3. Virtue Ethics - the intrinsic values of courage, justice, temperance, prudence and "golden mean" of behaviour through habits of character.


While there are many codes available outlining Ethics and Morals in journalists, often they are not followed. Advertising has led the greater public to confuse what is considered ethical, with that of bad taste, mixing there own perceptions and projections with the reality.


Although this one has got to be an advertising campaign I can't believe got approved:

A Fitness First advertisement that lights up how much you weigh as you sit on the seat waiting. Not only for yourself to see, but the whole public. If anything, it makes me defintely not want to join Fitness First! What if someone is dealing with body weight issues?
What do you think?

Saturday, 28 April 2012

Speaking of today's election...

I woke up this morning to yet another ad campaign for Ray Smith that I hadn't seen before. Now this one happened to include images of damaged roads and an explanation about how the previous council failed in basics.
Yes, I can vouch for this to an extent.
On Brisbane north side our roads are still full of road damages that only get worse every time it rains.
For JOUR1112, I reported on a story that I started before anyone had made a single mention of road damages. After pestering the politicians in my ward, in the last week they changed policies leaving a lot of very confused residents. Rhys joked around that I started it, but I like to think I had some influence ;)



Here is my article:






NORTHSIDE STREETS STILL STURGGLING



The Brisbane flood aftermath has left streets on the north side still suffering and they won’t stop any time soon.

One of many inadequate drains on busy Zillmere Road
Many main and busy streets including Zillmere Road, Handford Road, Beams Road and Robinson Road East faced constant flash flooding this wet season and remain littered with pot holes, inadequate drainage systems and dangerous quick fixes in attempted repairs.

The Summers of 2009/10, 2010/11 and 2011/12 have seen 484.8mm, 952.6mm and 638.0mm of rain respectively, all classified as ‘high’ recorded rainfall according to the Bureau of Meteorology.

While the ‘la nina’ weather pattern over Brisbane that caused the severe rainfall for this wet season has now broken, the damage remains the same, and is likely to worsen next Summer time.
The streets became a danger to both pedestrians and motorists as sink holes were opening up damaging vehicles while pedestrians were made to wade through rising flood waters on busy roads with no alternative routes. One sink hole opened in Geebung to measure over a 1 metre diameter before anything was done about it.

The loss of Labour in the March election meant Leanne Linard (ALP), who was planning on addressing these road problems has now stepped down. The newly elected NLP Member Jason Woodforth’s focus is instead centred on “cutting costs”.

In the upcoming Brisbane City Council election the focus for the Deagon and Bracken Ridge Wards roads are familiar. The representative responses of Victoria Newton (ALP), Gordana Blazevic (LNP), Georgia Farrell (Greens) and John Harbison  (Independent) all believed that the focus regarding transport was on the much needed Geebung overpass and nothing at this stage was on the table for road repairs.

Yet in local letterbox leaflets distributed through the week, Ray Smith announced an $800 Million Local Roads Package to be used on road maintenance for flood aftermath if elected, but north side suburbs have again missed out. The package does not include resurfacing or maintenance.

“In the last 4 years, the current Council Administration has failed to deliver more than half of their promised Road Action Plans and our roads have been left in a deteriorating state,” Ray Smith explained in a press conference this week.

The elections this year have meant a backlog of promises from politicians without any clear indicators they will honour them. The added confusion of last minute changed minds and policies regarding budgets have left residents fed up.

“It really is an important issue. It’s becoming quite dangerous when it rains,” said north-side resident Paul Hoffman, “It’s definitely going to affect how I vote.”

Tuesday, 17 April 2012

Public Media

Lecture Week 8 - 16/4/12


"The difference between commercial broadcasting and public media is the difference between consumers and citizens." - Nigel Milan (former Managing Directer of SBS)


What a great little quote. A quote that very much sums up my own opinion in a, lets be honest, much nicer way. Now, we all remember commercial media is profit driven. The definition of public media is:


"In general, a media whose mission is to serve or engage a public...it may be for profit as long as it's ultimate goal is to serve the public and not to turn a profit." 
- WGBH Educational Foundation Conference Open Content and Public Broadcasting (19-21 September 2006)

The main reason's why we need Public Media are
  1. Public Value - embedding a public service ethos
    - Value for licensing fee
    - Weighting public value against market impact
    - Public consultation
  2. Geographic universality - access to the whole of the country
  3. Universality of appeal - cater for all interests
  4. Special provision for minorities - eg, SBS in Australia
  5. Relationship to the sense of national identity and community - National building, heritage, identity and conversations
  6. Distanced from all vested interests
  7. Liberate rather than restrict broadcasters
Public media has a huge role on impacting a country, and ensuring those companies which are purely commercial and ensuring the public has access to many different avenues of not only news but of light entertainment. A huge area of this though is the news where Public Media really is in place to ensure we are able to have a less bias account of the news, as we trust public media news more than we would trust news programs such as 'Today Tonight' and 'A Current Affair'. 

41% of Australian;s get their news from ABC, however, there is the argument that public media news can be elitist, of limited interest and possibly out of touch as some people would prefer to watch news casts such as 'The Project' rather than ABC 7pm News. Public media is getting less prominence, and investigative journalist is slowly decreasing as we as a world have less resources in Journalism. The problem with this is that investigative journalism is the journalism that changes the world, and acts as a reality check to many companies, individuals and even nations.

While Public and Commercial media outlets are very different, they do have the same challenges. They both need audiences. To sum it up: Without an audience, there is no ratings, without ratings no profit, without profit no journalists.

Basically, like any media outlet, public media must follow the Journalist Code of Ethics to remain honest, independent and relevant. The Australian code is found here.

It is safe to say it is a hard road ahead for Journalists in yet another area. It seems the more I study this course, the more I'm being persuaded to take a different career path... But what is rewarding if it's not a challenge?

Tuesday, 10 April 2012

3 Cheers for QPS...

If you've managed to find yourself under a rock, and missed what happened this Easter long weekend in Brisbane, let me fill you in.

  • Sunday night in Zillmere 4 men fled in a stolen vehicle and were followed by police
  • The driver charged through a police road block and towards an officer causing shots to be fired with 1 man injured with a shot to the leg
  • All 4 were arrested
  • Monday morning a Brisbane task force named "Taskforce Kilo Perpetual" was launched as the 4 men were part of a wanted 30 for over 190 offenses in the past 4 months
  • Approx 2 hours later, 2 stolen cars became part of an over 2 hour long car chase across Brisbane City, tracked by Seven, Nine and Ten news helicopters to assist police
  • After successful use of road spikes, the cars came to a stop at a Shopping center, leading 7 young men ages 13 to 19 to be arrested.
  • The man who drove towards the police on Sunday night has since been charged with attempted murder and the other men face a variety of punishable offences ranging from 14 years to life if found guilty in the coming days.
Police arresting a suspect at Mt Ommaney shopping center Monday afternoon.
Picture: Glen Barnes. Source: Courier Mail
I have had a few thoughts racing through my head since this has unfolded and I sat in front of my television, while constantly refreshing twitter to learn the news as it happen. The first, of course, is how absolutely AMAZING it is that we have the news literally as it happens. If you have read any of my other blog posts, you're probably aware by now that I have a love-hate relationship with the media...

Well, today my friend, is one of love. And for many reasons...

For one, QLD Police only recently received their first helicopter, based on the Gold Coast. In moments like these (no matter how rare they are) this does seem like a minor oversight. Without the commercial media's use of helicopters tracking the separate cars and relaying the information to the police, catching the cars would have been, lets just say - much more tedious
MEDIA - 1
EMILY - 0

The news was literally instantaneous. I was able to receive a tweet from someone at ABC, and next thing I know, the information is being relayed over my television set with images to match. The power of social media, web 3.0 and the media making use of such powerful tools created a huge awareness of what was going on, to further assist in bringing justice.
MEDIA - 2
EMILY - 0

As for Zillmere, I did notice over the past few nights odd police behavior along Zillmere Road (which happens to be where I live, with lovely windows looking right over onto the street). My partner and I had had conversations about 'what are they up to?' and 'who are they going to catch?' only to be out maneuvered by clever police tactics and precautions. Heck, I felt safe in my own suburb when literally meters away road blocks were being set up, of which we knew nothing about until reported on the media. The Queensland Police have again reinforced why I feel safe somewhere where others might be quick to judge for a suburb that is currently in the news for some very serious crimes. Not a single person was injured, other than those committing crimes and resisting arrest, and in the end, the bad guys got caught. Not one alarm bell in my head went off...but I still like to think I am savvy and noticing their odd driving behaviors makes me in the loop ;) who knows, I could be a crime reporter yet!
MEDIA - 1
EMILY - 0
QUEENSLAND POLICE - 9999999999999999999....

Well done, QPS! For now I know I am safe, and my faith in Australian Media (at the very least) has been restored.
Plus, I like to imagine some 'The Raid'-esk moves going down in some apartment building near by....you never know!

Wednesday, 4 April 2012

Factual Story Telling - Vision

Lecture Week 4 - 19/3/12




Power of the Picture


It is only fitting to follow a week of text journalism with developments in photojournalism. As we've heard many times before, a picture is worth a thousand words, but I believe it is worth so much more. Images are what we remember, images are what stays in our minds when we've finished reading an article.


Most of the things in the Lecture I had seen it all before (as the images have burned into the back of my retina's from previous years) so I instead spent my time contemplating the power of images in the media, and the detrimental effect it can have.

Yes, I point the finger to certain Media outlets using Photoshop negatively when we are seeing what seems like more younger generations coping with depression and  anxiety issues, struggling to accept themselves. But how do we encourage them to accept themselves when even the most 'beautiful' celebrities are edited and made to be look like 'Gods'. It's creating an unattainable beauty, and the continual concept of 'thinness'.


The video we were shown by Dove only cemented my own opinion.


The power of images are somewhat underestimated. Images of young women sell everything - from cars to scarves. We are constantly bombarded with images of 'perfect' women in the Media, be it advertising or celebrity news. It's been revealed in studies that women who are self conscious about their bodies are those more likely to spend more money on cosmetics and on celebrity magazines. It is a vicious cycle that could easily continue to be detrimental to impressionable young women's minds.



But lets focus on the other end of the spectrum.
What makes a great photo?
"A picture has no meaning at all if it can't tell a story." - Eetu Silanpaa
Sums it up perfectly.

 December 8, 1980 John Lennon Rolling Stone Magazine Cover shoot
Annie Leibovitz - American Portrait Photographer
Perhaps best known for the famous last photograph of John-Lennon. Working for Rolling Stone Magazine, she had an understanding of what makes a good photograph.


Leibovitz utilized a then-new use of new colours, lighting and continues to astound audiences time and time again with images that tell amazing stories.


I think what is most  brilliant about her work is not only her ability to make use of regular techniques of framing, rule of thirds, leading lines (the list goes on...), but rather her ability for us to see within the people she photographs
.
Her images do not need editing on Photoshop to remove what society has labelled as 'imperfect' and in the cases she does use Photoshop, it is to portray a greater beauty and emotion than before, rather then hinder it (such as in her Disney themed photo set).


Leibovitz's Disney "Dream" photo set
I think, we need to be careful about what we put out there. We are aware of how powerful images can be in 'making or breaking' a story, but we need to realise it goes both ways - they are vital to making or breaking self esteem too.

Tuesday, 3 April 2012

Media in War


For university I am currently enrolled in a double degree – Journalism/Arts.  I took a year off between High School and university to work to afford to study, as well as take a look at what it was in Arts I actually wanted to major in. And 6 weeks in to my courses, I’ve already decided on 2 majors.

Let’s just say so far, the Peace and Conflict Studies introductory course has absolutely blown my mind, and reminded me what I am doing with my life. Last week’s lecture was on “The Role of Media in war and Peace” and I have had an inspiring and eye opening 6 days between then and my tutorial that finished exactly 23 minutes ago as I write this.

Example of WWI Propaganda
The roll of media, as we’re already aware, is ever changing, and constantly being remade as technology advances. As consumers, we are taught from an early age to be up to date with current affairs, and the importance of watching the news of an evening.

However, what I am sure many of my peers are unaware of is the power of governments to turn the media against its audience. A classic example is the conscription campaigns of WWI and WWII of both allies and enemies.  We were shown soldiers as heroes, portrayed as national icons, and while I admit, Australia is not as bad as the United States in this aspect, (for one, WWI was not forced conscription) this propaganda was then used against those who didn’t go to war either, being made to wear white feathers to show their cowardice if they had not fought in the war.


Fast forward to the Vietnam War, and you have the opposite. The complete shift in technology meant people were reporting on every aspect of the war, to the point where it was violence that caught our attention. At first we were shocked as we learnt the true aspects of what fighting the war was costing. As we came to terms with civilian deaths and how our own soldiers were dying, the Government lost support. But soon this changed and the same trends we have in Hollywood movies, we moved on to real life. I like to believe there are many journalists that worked with the best intensions, but the shift to a capitalist economy made the newspaper saying: If it bleeds, it leads. It was now the extreme opposite, the media become almost emotionally involved with the war, and we lost the independent 3rd perspective we needed the media to be. While definitely better than false information feed by the government beforehand, this was in no way 100% accurate either. We were privy to the absolute worst of the war, and as America’s Pentagon so graciously believes the war was lost “because of the media”.

Consequences of the Vietnam War have lasted much longer than the actual blood shed on the battlefield. After that, the United States Government sent out to make a point. Their next war against Grenada, was a complete media blackout until the war was over, which the United States easily took victory. Of course, Journalists everywhere were outraged! What about human rights?! What about the Right to Information, or the Right to Free Speech! The United States responded by basically saying “there will be x amount of journalists at any one time, to report in x area on x days and whatever you write, must be submitted for review before it is published”. And, again we were outraged!!


Or, were we?

The Pentagon did an excellent job distracting us. And, I mean excellent! Currently this system is still being used for War-zone reporting. The Army will decide who will report, what place they will report, and what days they will report – with the excuse that it is for “their own safety”. To me, embedded journalism just isn’t good enough.

Since I was about 13 years old after reading Aldous Huxley’s Nineteen-Eighty Four and once I first understood how Governments have the ability to censor media, I promised myself one day, I will be reporting the truth from a war zone. Regardless of the risk or dangers, as journalists it is our duty to report not only the truth (as we did in Vietnam) but the WHOLE truth. I look up to Kevin Sites, who utilised new technology and published on his blog what others were afraid to do, only to be kicked out of the war, and lose his job. He was not afraid. He was honest, and to me, that is the very best quality any journalist can attain.

In class, we are always hearing that we need to “get outraged!” as a journalist.



Well, today, I am extremely outraged.



Please, if you have not already, watch this Documentary. You will be outraged too.

Thursday, 29 March 2012

Media Use and Production Diary

Click-y click.

Whenever I sit in Central Station, I notice the people surrounding me absolutely enthralled with their smart phones. Judging by these behaviours, I imagine that they too would be surprised with their amount of media usage...


So, what was it that surprised me?

The interesting perception I made was as I used media I was usually multitasking. Most frequently I found myself on Facebook and “studying” at the same time.
Surprisingly, I was so interested in my own habits that I started the assessment again (I know, crazy right?!).
 I divided my media use and production diary into whole hours spent using media platforms (whole hours out of my entire day) and underneath I recorded the amount of time I was spending using particular media on those platforms (including hours multitasking).




Media usage measured in hours over 10 days
Media Used
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
TOTAL
Desktop Computer
 Study
 Online Newspaper
 Facebook
 Tumblr
 Emails
 General Web Browsing
 Blogger
 Twitter
2
1
0.25
1.5
1
0.25
0.5
0
0
1
0.25
0
0.5
0.5
0.25
0.5
1
0.5
3
1
0.5
2
1
0
1
1
0.25
3
1.5
0
2
0.5
0.5
1
0
0.25
1
0
0
0.5
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0.5
1.5
0.5
0.25
1
0.5
0.25
1
0.5
0
1
0.5
0
0
0
0
13
5.25
1.25
9
4
1.25
5
2.5
1.25
Laptop Computer
 Study
 Online Newspaper
 Facebook
 Tumblr
 Emails
 General Web Browsing
 Twitter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
2
0.5
2
1
0.5
1
0.25
4
2.5
0.5
3
2
1
1.5
0.25
4
3
1
3
1
0
2
0.5
5
3
1
3
2
1
2
0
2
1
0
1
0.5
0.25
0.5
0
1
0
0.25
0.5
0.25
0.25
1
0
19
11.5
3.25
12.5
6.75
3
8
1
Smart Phone
 Calls
 Texting
 Games
 Facebook
2
0.5
0.75
0.5
0.25
3
1
1
0
1
1
0
0.5
0
0.5
4
2
1
0.5
0.5
2
0
0.5
0.5
1
1
0.5
0.25
0
0.25
2
1
0.5
0.25
0.25
1
0
0.5
0
0.5
2
1
0.5
0.5
0
1.5
0
0.5
0.5
0.5
19.5
6
6
2.75
4.75
Television
 News Broadcasts
 Leisure Shows
2
1.5
0.5
2
1
1
1.5
1
0.5
2
1
1
3
1
2
3
1
2
1
0.5
0.5
2
1
1
3
1
2
2
1
1
21.5
10
11.5
Radio
 News Broadcasts
 Leisure shows
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0.5
0.5
0
0
0
0.5
0.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.5
0.25
0.25
0
0
0
2
1.25
0.75
Newspaper
 Local
 State
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.5
0
0.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
2.5
2
0.5

Basically, I use a lot of media on a daily basis. I use my desktop computer, laptop and smart phone more than radio and newspaper. While the television is in use for the most amount of hours, I never used it as a primary media source. I found from the total time on certain platforms, I am a true procrastinator.


Separately I recorded hours spent producing content. 


My total media use compared to media production in units of hours

On these websites that allow for production elements, my graph demonstrates I am active in my internet usage.


The most prominent conclusions I came to from my own and the cohort's media habits were:
  •  New Media of the internet and smart phones is in, while old media of newspapers are fading out
  • Facebook really is taking over our lives
  • The immediate accessibility of the internet had both negative and positives


The shift to New Media

Breakfast and dinner with my partner is spent in front of the TV watching news. My results emphasise the amount of time I spent on the internet across various platforms. 79% of JOUR1111 students, including myself, watch less than 2 hours of television a day. Since an average newscast is 1 hour, we can assume, television is in most cases used where we can leave the TV playing in the background, until an important story comes on. The lack of use of radio suggests the same, with 82.9% listening in the car. These old media platforms are now used when convenient whilst we’re engaging in other primary activities. 




The television is still powerful for Journalism, being the main source of News (however, closely followed by Facebook with 48.4% of students) but no longer regarded by a majority as a strong ‘leisure activity’.



Power of social networking

When comparing my results to the rest of the class, I am average in most areas. I have a few different types of social networking sites and blogs, making my internet usage across platforms somewhat excessive. However, what the survey failed to find out was the frequency in which the class happened to log in and check their Facebook accounts. And this was where I must call myself, an ‘addict’. I found interesting statistics that sum up my own usage as a 19 year old pretty accurately:

http://www.flowtown.com/blog/are-we-addicted-to-social-media

I am an avid Facebook consumer, but even more as shown in my graph, I am a Facebook producer. I am engaged in many “Groups” and “Pages” which I am constantly updating and creating comments, photos and messages.
I had no idea I relied so heavily on Facebook, for sharing personal news as well as world news.
Facebook is rapidly growing to be a huge part of Journalism and Communication, whether we like it or not.



Wonders of accessibility

With 77.3% of students using an internet enabled smart phone, we have the ability to constantly be on the internet. Since I bought a smart phone, my media use has at least doubled. Just like the people at Central, we never want to do nothing, because we have the ability to do almost anything.
The positives, however, of the media I could interact with, over 50% overall of my time was spent producing, not just consuming. With new media I am an active member of the online community, something I would never do if it was limited to Newspaper.



What does this mean for journalism?

I asked myself why this was happening and came to the conclusion that these 3 trends are entirely related.
  • The rise in technology has created a surge in ‘citizen journalists’ and the immediate availability of news and entertainment on the internet has decreased the need for old media.
  • Wifi has enabled the use of smart phones or laptops virtually anywhere meaning an increase in use, and subsequent increase in online media use and production.
  • Social Media has penetrated the traditional media types for journalism and communication. Alushka Rajaram of socialmedianews.com says “turn your Television on to any given News channel during a breaking news story and you’ll be greeted with information from Facebook and Twitter at least every hour”. 
  • Not only is the frequency in which these platforms are updated far more impressive than old media, but being able engage in discussion and create content on your own, certainly has a strong appeal, adding to the great appeal of social networking for news.

The Guardian article “Mobile and the news media's imploding business model” suggests there is a “bleak or non-existent future for news professionals in a mobile-dominated world” as the shift to online media has subsequently lead to the loss of profit in Journalism industry, and looking at my results alone, I can completely see why.


Let’s just say after this investigation to my own Media habits, I’ll be putting my computers down for longer, and buying newspapers more frequently…



(Even more fun statistics about social media's impact on the world here.)